Today, when the unanimous decision was made to adopt the AI Act at the EU level, I also met with those who are developing the first AI system for which I tried to closely follow the regulation in terms of policies and implementation.
Photo: Silvia USCOV
I went through the testing procedure under real-life conditions, but in a controlled environment, and it was a success.
In the coming period, we will audit the AI system to see what improvements need to be made so that we can move to the next phase in the coming months and it can be launched on the market.
However, I realized that the AI Act, with all its exceptions, is more of a start in regulating such AI systems, and much of the responsibility still falls on those who develop the systems.
In fact, no, the greater responsibility lies with those who provide legal advice to those who develop such systems.
Because, by interpreting the AI Act, you can find a lot of loopholes to escape regulation, but do we really want this?
Or do we want to have safe AI systems on the market that affect individual rights and freedoms as little as possible?
The plenary vote on AI Act is provisionally scheduled for 10-11 April and will enter into force 20 days after publication and will generally apply after 2 years.
The prohibited practices will apply after 6 months and the GPAI obligations will apply after one year.
Discover more from Justice News247
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

